COUNT II Class Action DESTINATION AND DELIVERY
1. Plaintiff reasserts the facts as set forth.
CLASS DEFINITION: All those consumers purchasing a car from the defendants in the past six years and were charged destination and delivery fees.
COUNT II Class Action DESTINATION AND DELIVERY
1. Plaintiff reasserts the facts as set forth.
CLASS DEFINITION: All those consumers purchasing a car from the defendants in the past six years and were charged destination and delivery fees.
COUNT I Class Action DOUBLE CHARGE DOCUMENTARY FEES
1. Plaintiff included by reference the facts as set forth above as part of the allegations. Plaintiffs assert that the defendants have violated the NJ Consumer Fraud Act by double charging documentary fees improperly in violation of the Consumer Fraud Act.
CLASS DEFINITION: All those consumers purchasing a car from the defendants in the past six years and were charged a credit inquiry fee and an online registration.
This is an example of a portion of a class action complaint under the consumer fraud act
CARTON & RUDNICK 262 HWY 35 RED BANK, NEW JERSEY 07701 (732) 842-2070 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS OUR FILE NO. 10035
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
It is not uncommon that there is absolutely no disclosure to the sales staff and they are not even given what is commonly known as a deal recap or some sort of washout sheet. It is not uncommon that the sales staff is completely left in the dark pertaining to how their commissions are calculated, what the costs are, what the charge backs are and other reductions. There is a natural tendency upon the sales staff to doubt the costs associated with the sale of the automobiles. If the pack is only $500, why did an apparent $3,000 profit vanish overnight and turn into a $100 flat fee?
This is an area of heated and ongoing litigation between sales staff and dealership management. How exactly are the gross commission on profits calculated, charge accounted for and disclosed to the sales staff? It is not uncommon that there is absolutely no disclosure to the sales staff and they are not even given what is commonly known as a [tail recap] or some sort of washout sheet. It is not uncommon that the sales staff is completely left in the dark pertaining to how their commissions are calculated, what the costs are, what the charge backs are and other reductions in the gross commissionable proceeds.
The same laws that apply to contracts apply to agreements between sales staff and their management team. There is an obligation of good faith and fair dealings and there is an obligation pertaining to full disclosure. I have discovered that it is not uncommon that there are various “extras” that the dealership management feels obligated to put into the costs of the vehicle for which a sales staff member might be upset.
The auto sales business is a major tax source for all states, including New Jersey. In this regard, many states have hundreds, if not thousands of dealerships, which generate billions of dollars in tax revenue for the state coffers. All these dealerships rely upon the skills of sales people to sell cars in order to benefit themselves as well as the state economy. It is an ongoing battle between the sales persons and management pertaining to the issuance and calculation of gross commissionable proceeds upon which sales people are paid.
Generally, there are two areas of profit to the dealership,
the front end and the back end. The front end is associated with the profit on the sale of the car and of itself. The back end profit pertains to and relates to the profit on financing, after sale items, pre-delivery services and other items, such as lo-jack. Car dealerships operate differently, however; generally, the sales people get paid on the front end and the managers and the upper management get paid on the back end of the transaction. On occasion, a car dealership does provide a certain amount of computation to the sales staff based on the total profit of the dealership, which would naturally include the back end or the reserve part of the transaction.
WHAT DID TOYOTA KNOW ?
The USA Today has an interesting report that NHTSA was notified by an insurance company, State Farm, of possible defects.
The law firm of The Law Office of Jonathan Rudnick is investigating claims that individuals and/or entities have against Toyota Motor Sales for allegations that the vehicle is working improperly. As it has been reported recently, there is a significant recall underway with regard to problems which are currently widely known with various models distributed by Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A.
There is breaking news that there has been political implications for this issue.
On January 21, 2010 Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. issued a press release indicating there would be a recall of approximately 2.3 million vehicles to fix/correct a sticking accelerator in various specific Toyota Division models.
This press release stated that this action was distinct from an ongoing recall of approximately 4.2 million vehicles, Toyota and Lexus, to reduce the risks of pedal entrapment.
The press release indicates that Toyota had been investigating isolated reports over a lengthy period of time to determine if there was a risk under certain circumstances of danger to the drivers and the public with regard to this pedal condition. This is according to the Toyota website.
This is scary stiff, taken from a NHTSA report: Be carefull
Driving home from work, I experienced a sudden uncontrollable surge in acceleration causing my speed to increase from about 60 mph to 80+ mph.
Immediately I began to brake hard as I was rapidly approaching traffic just ahead of me. Fortunately the inside left lane was unoccupied and I was able to make an immediate lane change. Initially I depressed the brake pedal as hard as I could using both feet but only managed to slow the vehicle to 40-45 mph. With my speed reduced, I alternated between pumping the accelerator pedal and pulling up on it from the underside with my right foot as it became clear that the throttle was stuck in an open position. The vehicle continued to speed back up to over 65 mph with less pressure on the brake pedal.